SKILLEMALL.ai

AB wjs-burning-subtitles

Use when the user has a video + an SRT and wants the subtitles either burned into the pixels (libass, always-visible) or soft-muxed as a togglable track. Also handles the final composite step for the localization pipeline — burn subs, mix a dub track, and keep the original audio as a low-volume bed, all in ONE ffmpeg encode (no cascade). Verifies libass availability and auto-downloads a static evermeet ffmpeg build when Homebrew's stripped binary lacks it. Triggers — "烧字幕", "硬字幕", "burn subtitles", "burn-in subs", "embed subtitle", "soft mux SRT", "把字幕烧进视频", "做最终合成".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Jian Shuo Wang v0.1.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 2 806 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Also handles the final composite step for the localization pipeline — burn subs, mix a dub track, and keep the original audio as a low-volume bed, all in ONE…

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
98/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
95
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 85Steps. 42 steps, 2 vague phrases
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2806 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 573: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 19 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 42 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 95.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This subtitle tool does what it says, but it may automatically download and run an unverified ffmpeg executable from the internet.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026