SKILLEMALL.ai

AB wjs-transcribing-audio

Use when the user has audio or video and wants a timestamped transcript (SRT) in the source language. Routes by source language — Chinese defaults to Volcano (豆包) ASR; other languages (Spanish, English, Portuguese, French, Italian, Japanese, Korean, etc.) use OpenAI Whisper API with word-level timestamps and self-assembled cues. Outputs SRT with punctuation-bounded cues capped for on-screen reading. Triggers — "转写", "转成字幕", "做 SRT", "transcribe", "make subtitles", "speech to text", "出字幕".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Jian Shuo Wang v0.1.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 814 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Routes by source language — Chinese defaults to Volcano (豆包) ASR; other languages (Spanish, English, Portuguese, French, Italian, Japanese, Korean, etc.) use…

As a process B 74/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

IntegrationMedia and videoAI and agentsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
74/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 74/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Steps. 37 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2814 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 493: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 37 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill appears to be a transcription tool, but it can send user audio to external speech services using local API keys without clearly requiring user approval first.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026