BF wechat-post-skill
User-authorized WeChat Official Account article workflow for topic selection, drafting, editing, image planning, pre-publish review, and handoff to the user's configured WeChat publishing tool. Use when the user asks to 发公众号, 写公众号文章, 做公众号推送, or 发布草稿箱. Requires the user to provide and control any WeChat account access through environment variables or a vetted companion publisher.
As a process F 47/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: img0.png, img1.png, imgX.png
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: img0.png - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: img1.png - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: imgX.png - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: img0.png, img1.png, imgX.png
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 16 mutating operations with no state check
- 70Failures and branches. 5 branches
- 85Steps. 42 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1034 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 381: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 5 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 42 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.