FD agnes-image-gen
使用 Agnes AI 升级版图像生成模型 agnes-image-2.1-flash 生成图片。同时支持文生图(text-to-image)与图生图(image-to-image)。当用户说「用 Agnes 生成图片」「用 Agnes 画一张」「Agnes 生成」「用这张图生成/改成……」或明确要求使用 Agnes API 进行文生图/图生图时,加载本 skill。不消耗 WorkBuddy 积分,仅消耗 Agnes API 额度(当前图像生成免费)。
使用 Agnes AI 升级版图像生成模型 agnes-image-2.1-flash 生成图片。同时支持文生图(text-to-image)与图生图(image-to-image)。当用户说「用 Agnes 生成图片」「用 Agnes 画一张」「Agnes 生成」「用这张图生成/改成……」或明确要求使用…
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The files contain someone else's key or token. If it is live, your agent will call third-party services under a stranger's identity; if it was revoked, the skill's scripts simply fail. Such a key often arrives with the author's whole workspace, personal data included.
The key is visible to everyone who downloaded the skill and has likely been copied by catalog-scanning bots already. Revoke it now, check bills and access logs, then reissue.
How to improve
- Remove the critical guard findings (secrets, dangerous commands, hidden instructions): while they stand the skill is blocked and cannot grade above F.
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 6
-
critical Secrets in code
secret-openai-keyscripts/agnes_gen.py:39OpenAI-style API key (quoted — discussed, not commanded)DEFAULT_API_KEY = "sk-8…9Cz"
quoted -
critical Secrets in code
secret-openai-keySKILL.md:97OpenAI-style API key (quoted — discussed, not commanded)-H "Authorization: Bearer sk-8…9Cz" \
quoted -
critical Secrets in code
secret-openai-keySKILL.md:119OpenAI-style API key (quoted — discussed, not commanded)-H "Authorization: Bearer sk-8…9Cz" \
quoted -
critical Secrets in code
secret-openai-keySKILL.md:208OpenAI-style API key (quoted — discussed, not commanded)-H "Authorization: Bearer sk-8…9Cz" \
quoted -
critical Secrets in code
secret-openai-keySKILL.md:223OpenAI-style API key (quoted — discussed, not commanded)-H "Authorization: Bearer sk-8…9Cz" \
quoted -
critical Secrets in code
secret-openai-keySKILL.md:241OpenAI-style API key (quoted — discussed, not commanded)-H "Authorization: Bearer sk-8…9Cz" \
quoted
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "agent_created"
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 53 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2511 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 229: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 31 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 53 items
- +4Has examples (18 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.