CD pipeline-architecture
採用 Pipeline Architecture(先宣告意圖、後統一執行)的專案,其業務邏輯讀寫流程的結構規範。支援 Python/FastAPI、TypeScript/Node.js 與 Flutter/Dart 三種實作,並提供 Payload CMS 與 Cloudflare Workers 的專屬補充。當專案已採用此架構、且任務涉及業務邏輯流程時使用,包含:新增 API endpoint、設計資料寫入流程、實作權限檢查、多步驟資料處理、跨系統寫入(DB、外部 API、裝置變數)、審計日誌,或任何「先決策後執行」的 workflow。在 Flutter 專案中同樣適用於使用者觸發的業務寫入流程:UseCase、ViewModel 的 Command、本地資料庫寫入、呼叫後端 API、離線寫入與 outbox 同步。看到 pipeline、step、query、mutation、scratch、persistence、StepCommit、StepStop、DataMutation、run_workflow、make_pipeline、runWorkflow、makePipeline、outbox、離線同步 等本架構專有名詞,或要在既有 pipeline 專案中修改業務邏輯時,讀取此 Skill 並依專案語言載入對應的 references 檔案;專案若以 Payload CMS 為基底(存在 payload.config.ts、collections/、custom endpoints、collection hooks),額外載入 references/payload-cms.md;專案若部署在 Cloudflare Workers(存在 wrangler.toml 或 wrangler.jsonc),額外載入 references/cloudflare-workers.md,在 Cloudflare 上規劃採用本架構而要決定資料庫(Hyperdrive、D1、Durable Objects)時也要讀取;專案若是 Flutter(存在 pubspec.yaml 且依賴 flutter),載入 references/flutter.md。不適用於一次性腳本、prototype、資料分析、Widget 與純顯示邏輯,或專案尚未採用此架構的情況;使用者明確指示其他做法時,以使用者指示為準。
採用 Pipeline Architecture(先宣告意圖、後統一執行)的專案,其業務邏輯讀寫流程的結構規範。支援 Python/FastAPI、TypeScript/Node.js 與 Flutter/Dart 三種實作,並提供 Payload CMS 與 Cloudflare Workers…
As a process D 38/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: references/flutter.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5662 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/flutter.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 38/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/flutter.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 24 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5662 tokens
- 100Steps. 83 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 1012: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -285 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 26 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 83 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 55.