AD code-reviewer
Thorough code review with focus on security, performance, and best practices for Go projects. Includes Go test coverage analysis (line/function/branch coverage) and reporting. Use when: reviewing Go code, performing security audits, checking for code quality, reviewing pull requests, or when user mentions code review, PR review, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, test coverage.
As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (code-reviewer) differs from the folder (jinyun1)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 52 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1531 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 391: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 52 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 8)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.