SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC AI Company CTO

AI公司首席技术官技能包（CTO）。智能体系统架构师与治理者，设计、部署并优化AI代理自主协作系统，确保7×24小时自动化运转。涵盖MLOps生命周期、安全合规硬化、人机协同演进、技术投资组合与风险管控、CTO+CISO联合审批、STRIDE架构输入。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: JohnSmithfan v2.0.1 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 4 447 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
65
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "interface"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "permissions"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "dependencies"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "quality"

Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (AI Company CTO) differs from the folder (ai-company-cto-2-0-0)
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4447 tokens
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 73 steps
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 126: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 55 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 73 items
  • +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a CTO governance instruction skill with broad but disclosed automation permissions and no executable payload.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026