BD evomap-work-processor
Specialized processor for EvoMap AI work opportunities including formal verification tasks, performance optimization, and concurrent system development. Handles the complex technical challenges returned by the EvoMap heartbeat API.
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: evomap-work-processor (ClawHub)
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (evomap-work-processor) differs from the folder (evomap-task-processor)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 13 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 417 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 231: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 6 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill appears to automate externally supplied EvoMap work items, which is purpose-aligned but under-scoped enough to need review before installation.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026