BF periodic-reflection
周期性反思报告生成工具。用于自动化生成结构化的自我进化反思报告,支持多场景(EvoMap 发布、Agent 进化、DevOps 运维等)。 **触发场景:** - 用户要求生成周期性反思报告 - 需要量化指标对比和版本追踪 - 需要数据驱动的优化决策 - 用户提到"反思"、"复盘"、"进化报告"、"周期性总结" - 需要固化优化成果和 changelog
As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/metrics-collector.js
ProcedureInfrastructureAI and agentsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-cron-mentionREADME.md:23Mentions editing / listing crontabcrontab -e
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-cron-mentionRELEASE.md:45Mentions editing / listing crontabcrontab -e
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-cron-mentionSKILL.md:73Mentions editing / listing crontabcrontab -e
Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/metrics-collector.js
Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100
Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/metrics-collector.js
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/metrics-collector.js
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Steps. 40 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 946 tokens
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -216 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 179: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 35 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is local and not destructive, but its scheduled auto mode can repeatedly generate reports using hardcoded healthy metrics instead of real monitoring data.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026