DC guardian-shield
(no description)
As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, failures and branches, progress reporting
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The text contains phrases like "ignore previous instructions" or "you are now…". That is an attempt to hijack the agent: it may break your rules, the system limits or company policy.
An honest skill does not need them: state the role and the rules directly without overriding other instructions. Otherwise catalog scanners and corporate filters will block the listing.
How to improve
- Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 8
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 8
-
medium Instruction override
en-ignore-previousscripts/patterns.py:59Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions") (detector / deny-list definition)Pattern("pi-001", "Ignore previous instructions", "prompt_injection", ThreatLevel.CRITICAL,detector -
medium Instruction override
en-ignore-previousscripts/patterns.py:141Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions") (detector / deny-list definition)Pattern("jb-004", "Ignore safety guidelines", "jailbreak", ThreatLevel.CRITICAL,detector -
medium Instruction override
en-ignore-previousscripts/patterns.py:143Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions") (detector / deny-list definition)"Direct attempt to bypass safety guidelines."),
detector
A further 5 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
frontmatterSKILL.md: no YAML frontmatter block found - error
name-missingSKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name` - error
description-missingSKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger
Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100
- 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 21 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 683 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
- -34 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 0.