SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD openspec

Use OpenSpec (`@fission-ai/openspec`) for spec-driven development when implementing non-trivial changes in existing projects. Use when the environment exposes openspec tools (`openspec_init`, `openspec_list`, `openspec_show`, `openspec_validate`, `openspec_archive`, `openspec_status`, `openspec_update`, `openspec_run`). Triggered by user phrases like "propose a change", "spec this out", "open a change for X", or when starting a multi-step feature in a repo that already has an `openspec/` directory.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: juanclaw v0.1.1 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 753 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ReferenceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
48/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (openspec) differs from the folder (openspec-skill)
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 18 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 753 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 503: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is an instruction-only OpenSpec workflow skill that transparently guides project-local spec creation and maintenance.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026