SKILLEMALL.ai

BC intimate-ch06-interdependence

在对话中辅助学习"亲密关系/Intimate Relationships"第 6 章"相互依赖"。基于 Rowland S. Miller《Intimate Relationships》教材第 6 版。(interdependence 相互依赖;social exchange 社会交换;rewards 奖赏;costs 代价;outcome 结果;comparison level 比较水平;CLalt 替代的比较水平;investment 投入;equity 公平;communal relationship 共有关系;commitment 承诺;investment model 投入模型)使用渐进式披露,按需读取 references/ 下的细节,把课本知识自然引入学习对话

ClawHub Agent Skills author: John Do v1.0.0 MIT-0 11 files body ≈ 551 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ReferenceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 22 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 551 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 341: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 7 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (9 of 9)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
The supplied scan signals do not show malicious or suspicious behavior, but the actual target skill artifact was not clearly present in the workspace for independent confirmation.
LLM: benign (low) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026