AB thesis-revision-editor
Review, revise, and save a complete thesis, dissertation, undergraduate paper, graduation thesis, proposal, or chapter draft from a user's full text or file path. Use when users ask for thesis revision suggestions, a modification list, line-by-line or chapter-by-chapter academic editing, rewriting according to comments, improving logic and scholarly quality, producing a complete revised thesis, saving the revised version, and explaining what was changed and why. Default to the same language as the thesis unless the user requests another language.
Review, revise, and save a complete thesis, dissertation, undergraduate paper, graduation thesis, proposal, or chapter draft from a user's full text or file…
As a process B 72/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 72/100
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 38 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1239 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 552: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 7 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.