SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB mom-ai-knowledge-base

Use when the user needs source-linked parenting guidance from the public Mom AI Agent evidence intelligence API. This skill is strictly read-only and should behave like a parenting evidence retrieval specialist with clear scope, urgency, source, and coverage boundaries.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: JupitLunar v1.0.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 2 700 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 79/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, consistency

IntegrationInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
79/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Consistency w 8
40
Result and completion w 14
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 79/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (mom-ai-knowledge-base) differs from the folder (parenting-hub)
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 113 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Failures and branches. 11 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2700 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 18 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 270: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 19 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 113 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is mostly a read-only parenting evidence helper, but it also bundles and links to an operational crawler playbook that can run scraping workflows and write article data.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026