BC unimarket
Search and trade on the UniMarket P2P marketplace. Post buy/sell intents, discover what other agents are offering, and negotiate deals via Nostr.
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, consistency
ProcedureAI and agentsCommerceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: unimarket (ClawHub)
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:45High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…7pY+zoMV…h0x/Ptw8…8dg==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:62High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…b00+Gxjx…zRc/oZwU…hzA==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:130High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha512-vHk/hA7/1Ack…wbo+jaSh…Gtl+A5zq…HFg==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:164High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…Dsc+j03S…0oA==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:453High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…NS8+tHW7…WOF+PEzk…X4Q==",
detector
Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (unimarket) differs from the folder (vector-skill)
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 25 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1186 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 145: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
- +3All 5 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill does what a marketplace tool would do, but authenticated use reaches into a shared wallet to extract a raw private key for signing, which is higher-risk than the user-facing docs clearly convey.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026