AC shp
Inspect, explain, validate, and convert ESRI Shapefile datasets, including `.shp/.shx/.dbf/.prj` sidecar requirements, CRS detection, field-name/type limits, encoding problems, multipart geometry issues, and migration guidance to GeoPackage or GeoJSON. Use when the user asks about shapefile, Shapefile, `.shp` files, DBF encoding, PRJ/CRS problems, or batch shapefile cleanup. 中文触发：shapefile、shp、dbf、prj、坐标系丢失、字段截断、编码乱码。
As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency
The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (shp) differs from the folder (shapefile)
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 85Steps. 28 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 690 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 421: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.