AC wps
WPS Office workflow for Chinese users: create, edit, review, convert, and troubleshoot Writer/Spreadsheets/Presentation documents in .docx/.xlsx/.pptx and WPS native formats. Use when users ask for WPS 文档处理、格式兼容、批注修订、模板套用、导出 PDF、多人协作，或从 Microsoft Office 迁移到 WPS 的操作建议。中文触发：WPS、文字、表格、演示、批注、修订、格式错乱、导出 PDF、兼容性。
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 41 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 494 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 308: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 4 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.