SKILLEMALL.ai

AB retaincraft

Spaced repetition & FSRS-5 AI learning assistant with active recall, Feynman technique, interleaved practice, causal questioning. 间隔重复FSRS-5 AI学习助手,整合主动回忆、费曼学习法、交错练习、因果追问。 Evidence-based: distributed practice d=0.85, practice testing d=0.74, AI tutoring 0.63-1.3 SD. Multi-platform compatible: OpenClaw, WorkBuddy, Claude Code, Hermes Agent. Features: FSRS-5 spaced repetition (default), SM-2 fallback, forgetting curve, burnout detection, learning contract, weekly report. 169 tests, 24 CLI commands, 14 academic citations, zero external dependencies.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 开夏 v1.4.5 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 3 905 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 72/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationResearchAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
72/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

Process rating: all ten parameters 72/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 119 steps
  • 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
  • 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3905 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 17 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -259 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 552: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 39 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 119 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
RetainCraft is a coherent study assistant, but it can create persistent reminder/report jobs using auto-detected OpenClaw session routing data and stores learning history across local files and platform memory.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 28 May 2026