SKILLEMALL.ai

AC preflight

Pre-publish audience reaction check. Run any content (tweet, launch copy, pricing page, announcement, blog post) through diverse AI personas before publishing. Returns engagement prediction, share potential, and specific rewrites. Use when about to post on social media, launch a product, announce pricing changes, publish a blog post, or any time you want to predict audience reaction before going live. Triggers on "preflight this", "how will this land", "test this before posting", "will anyone care about this", "check this copy", "pre-test this announcement".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Kevin Bolander v1.0.0 MIT-0 4 files · 1 script body ≈ 565 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 16 d ago

Pre-publish audience reaction check.

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureMarketingWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 10 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 565 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 564: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a coherent pre-publication review tool, with some privacy and prompt-injection hardening caveats but no evidence of malicious behavior.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 14 Sept 2026