SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD agents-refresh-md-en

AGENTS.md/IDENTITY/SOUL/USER periodic reload skill to keep context fresh (.md-only v1.1.2). Prevents confusion and forgetting in long sessions. Edit HEARTBEAT.md + add cron (manual tool calls). Lightweight ClawHub distribution without Python scripts. Use when: (1) Long sessions risk personality drift, (2) Avoid /new for human-like memory continuity, (3) Auto-summarize MEMORY/ToDo.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: kentaroid-bot v1.1.2 5 files body ≈ 722 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorAI and agentsInfrastructureWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
39/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (agents-refresh-md-en) differs from the folder (agents-refresh-md)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 18 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 722 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
    • -219 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 383: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill appears to do what it advertises, but it creates recurring automation that can repeatedly read personal/context logs and rewrite persistent agent memory files.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: benign · 28 May 2026