SKILLEMALL.ai

AC openapi-parser

Parses complex OpenAPI specs and generates Drift test cases from them. Use whenever the user wants to generate, write, or scaffold Drift tests from an OpenAPI spec — especially when the spec contains complex schemas: anyOf/oneOf/allOf, discriminators, polymorphism, inheritance, $ref chains, regex patterns, enums, or optional fields. Use when the user asks to "create tests for an endpoint", "cover all response variants", "generate test cases from the spec", or says anything like "each viable combination of responses". Use when the user is trying to understand what values are valid for a complex schema field, or when they paste a spec path and ask what tests to write.

ClawHub Claude Code author: Kevin Rohan Vaz v1.0.0 MIT-0 11 files body ≈ 1 372 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Parses complex OpenAPI specs and generates Drift test cases from them.

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, failures and branches, running it twice

GeneratorSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
98/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
96
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 85Steps. 17 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1372 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 674: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 96.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is a coherent OpenAPI-to-Drift test generator, but its remote reference fetching and broad activation need user review before use.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 16 Sept 2026