SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC agent-reputation

(no description)

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Oleksii Kaganovsky v1.0.0 3 files body ≈ 644 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
73/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
36
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
61/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token scripts/check_reputation.py:31
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    COLONY_API_KEY = "col_…Yuo"
    quoted
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token scripts/check_reputation.py:33
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    UGIG_API_KEY = "ugig…w1D"
    quoted

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error description-missing SKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "publishable"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "entrypoint"

Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 35 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 644 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 36.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill needs review because parts of its trust score can describe the user’s own accounts instead of the agent being checked, while also using bundled and local credentials.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026