SKILLEMALL.ai

DD grok-swarm

(no description)

Not recommendedlow grade D
ClawHub Agent Skills author: Billy Brenner v1.0.9 MIT-0 8 files · 1 script body ≈ 495 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

ReferenceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
D
51/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
85
Quality 40%
0
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Instruction override medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The text contains phrases like "ignore previous instructions" or "you are now…". That is an attempt to hijack the agent: it may break your rules, the system limits or company policy.

For the author

An honest skill does not need them: state the role and the rules directly without overriding other instructions. Otherwise catalog scanners and corporate filters will block the listing.

How to improve

  1. Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 3

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 3
  • medium Instruction override en-ignore-previous bridge/cli.py:148
    Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions") (detector / deny-list definition)
    parser.add_argument("--system", "-s", help="Override system prompt")
    detector
  • medium Instruction override en-ignore-previous bridge/grok_bridge.py:332
    Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions") (detector / deny-list definition)
    parser.add_argument("--system", help="Override system prompt (for orchestrate mode)")
    detector
  • medium Instruction override en-ignore-previous bridge/index.js:77
    Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions") (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    --system <text>     Override system prompt (required for orchestrate mode)
    quoted

Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error frontmatter SKILL.md: no YAML frontmatter block found
  • error name-missing SKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name`
  • error description-missing SKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 15 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 495 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 10 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 0.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is broadly coherent, but it needs review because it can send selected files to a third-party model service, discover local API credentials, write files, and includes an under-documented arbitrary shell execution option.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026