SKILLEMALL.ai

BD spatiotemporal-analysis

时空智能分析法(v2.0 完整版)。纵向时间线 × 横向对照 × 交汇判断,必须先检索后下判断。含双交付模式(摘要→完整版)、当代实证研究不用学术库、引用覆盖率门槛、PDF 输出配方、松哥写作约定、5 子 agent 工程化流水线、数据采集脚本与模板等。触发:「时空智能分析」「时空分析」「spatiotemporal」「深度研究报告」「竞争格局分析」,或用户要求「研究一下 X 与 Y 的关系」这类带时间维度+对照维度的题目。

ClawHub Hermes author: viflow v2.0.2 MIT-0 12 files body ≈ 3 569 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

时空智能分析法(v2.0 完整版)。纵向时间线 × 横向对照 × 交汇判断,必须先检索后下判断。含双交付模式(摘要→完整版)、当代实证研究不用学术库、引用覆盖率门槛、PDF 输出配方、松哥写作约定、5 子 agent…

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-long-hermes description is 214 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period)
  • warning description-no-when neither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Consistency. The Hermes dialect needs category and tags
  • 100Steps. 116 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3569 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 20 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -236 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 214: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 31 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 116 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This research skill is mostly coherent, but it also includes broad skill-management instructions, persistent home-directory writes, and an unsafe external Python import that warrant careful review before installation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 8 Sept 2026