AC buddy-bills
智能收支手帐。记录个人和家庭日常收支、管理固定支出、生成月度汇总报告。 触发场景：用户说"记账"、"花了多少"、"买了xxx花了xxx"、"这个月支出"、"工资发了"、"转账给xxx"、"消费记录"、"月底汇总"、"固定支出"、"收支明细"、"结余多少"、"储蓄率"、"帮我记一笔"、"调出账单"、"查看消费"等与收支记录、财务查询、预算管理相关的请求时触发。
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 30 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 384 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 180: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 30 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 3)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This looks like a coherent local finance-recording skill, but it stores and modifies sensitive financial records with broad triggers and not enough upfront consent or retention guidance.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026