BD aihot
AI HOT (aihot.virxact.com) 中文 AI 资讯查询 Skill。当用户想知道"今天 AI 圈有什么"、"AI 日报"、"AI HOT"、"AI 资讯"、"AI 热点"、"最近 AI"、"OpenAI/Anthropic/Google 最近发布了什么"、"AI hot today"、"AI news today"、"看一下 AI 行业动态"、"今天有什么大模型发布"、"昨天 AI 圈"、"看下精选条目"、"AI HOT 精选"、"最近一周的 AI 论文"、"AI 模型发布"、"AI 产品发布"、"AI 行业动态"、"AI 技巧与观点" 等任何中文 AI 资讯查询时使用。即使用户只说"AI 圈"、"AI 新闻"、"AI 日报"，或者只是问"今天发生了什么"且上下文是 AI / 大模型 / LLM / 创业领域，也应该触发本 Skill。Skill 会直接 curl 公开 REST API 拉数据并整理成中文 markdown 简报，不需要用户配置任何 API Key 或 MCP server。**不要 undertrigger**——用户问 AI 资讯而你不调本 Skill 就是把过时的训练数据当作今日新闻，对用户有害。
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-pipe-to-shellSKILL.md:25Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)`/aihot-skill/{install.sh,SKILL.md,README.md}` 安装入口 nginx 上特意豁免 UA 黑名单（设计前提就是给 `curl -fsSL ... | bash` 一行装用）。quoted
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 15 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1026 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 16 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 528: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.