SKILLEMALL.ai

AC vulkan-encyclopedia

Vulkan specification/reference workflow for Vulkan-API-specific questions, exact command and structure semantics, valid-usage and VUID lookup, synchronization reasoning, pipeline/resource setup, extension/feature checks, limits/formats/capabilities review, and code review in a Vulkan API context. Use when the request is clearly about Vulkan itself: `Vk*` types, `vk*` commands, VUIDs, instance/physical-device/logical-device setup, swapchains, queues, command buffers, descriptors, render passes or dynamic rendering, pipelines, memory/resources, synchronization, SPIR-V in a Vulkan pipeline context, or extension/feature behavior. Do not use for generic graphics programming, engine-level rendering design, shader-language-only questions, OpenGL, Direct3D, Metal, CUDA, or generic shader authoring unless the Vulkan API/spec layer is materially involved.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: kklouzal v0.1.0 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 1 790 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 56 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1790 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Description length 857: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 56 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This Vulkan helper openly uses official docs and a workspace-local cache, with no evidence of hidden or destructive behavior.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026