SKILLEMALL.ai

AC qa-ai-context-engineering

将前面所有分析步骤(需求解构、场景树、边界清单、风险评估等)打包成一个结构化的AI上下文包,确保AI在生成测试用例时拥有完整的业务上下文、功能上下文和技术上下文。当已经完成了需求分析、场景构建和深度设计,即将进入提示词生成阶段时,必须经过此步骤。上下文包的完整度直接决定了AI生成用例的质量——输入垃圾,输出也是垃圾。当上游分析缺失时,本技能会读取用户上传的需求文件或fetch用户提供的URL以补充上下文,并对原始描述做结构化解析后并入上下文包,但不会替代上游分析步骤——缺失项仍需标注并建议回退补充。 触发场景:上下文工程、构建上下文、上下文包、测试上下文、结构化上下文、上下文不够、已完成需求解构和场景构建需要打包上下文时。 Use when the user asks about: building a structured context package so an LLM has full business, functional, and technical context before generating test cases.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: kokxi v1.8.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 632 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 15 d ago

将前面所有分析步骤(需求解构、场景树、边界清单、风险评估等)打包成一个结构化的AI上下文包,确保AI在生成测试用例时拥有完整的业务上下文、功能上下文和技术上下文。当已经完成了需求分析、场景构建和深度设计,即将进入提示词生成阶段时,必须经过此步骤。上下文包的完整度直接决定了AI生成用例的质量——输入垃圾,输出也是垃圾。…

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 16 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 632 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 476: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a documentation-only QA context-packaging helper with disclosed file/URL reading behavior and no bundled executable code or persistence.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 Sept 2026