SKILLEMALL.ai

AC qa-ai-output-critique

对AI生成的测试用例进行八维评审(完整性、正确性、可执行性、风险覆盖、规范性、一致性、追溯性、冗余度),是AI生成用例后的第一个质量门禁。当AI刚刚生成了一大批测试用例、你需要确保这些用例真的有价值而不是"看起来不错"时,应当使用此技能。不要假设AI输出的都是对的——AI经常生成语义正确但实际操作不了的用例。每个维度评分低于7分的必须标注问题并使用MISSING/WRONG/VAGUE等规范格式标记。无上游场景树/风险清单时降级为六维评审(跳过追溯性、简化完整性)。 触发场景:检查一下输出、评审用例质量、验证完整性、这个用例对吗、自动检查时。 Use when the user asks about: critiquing AI-generated test cases across completeness, correctness, executability, risk coverage, conformance, consistency, traceability, and redundancy.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: kokxi v1.8.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 683 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 15 d ago

对AI生成的测试用例进行八维评审(完整性、正确性、可执行性、风险覆盖、规范性、一致性、追溯性、冗余度),是AI生成用例后的第一个质量门禁。当AI刚刚生成了一大批测试用例、你需要确保这些用例真的有价值而不是"看起来不错"时,应当使用此技能。不要假设AI输出的都是对的——AI经常生成语义正确但实际操作不了的用例。每个维度…

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 8 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 683 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 459: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 8 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a Chinese-language QA review skill that critiques AI-generated test cases and does not show hidden execution, persistence, exfiltration, or destructive behavior.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 Sept 2026