BC qa-ci-cd-testing
当需要把测试集成到 CI/CD 流水线中、或者现有流水线的测试环节跑起来效率低不可靠时使用此技能。覆盖流水线各阶段的分层测试卡点设计（提交检查→单元测试→接口测试→UI 测试→回归测试）、工具集成策略和质量门禁配置。不要在 CI 里堆满慢的 UI 测试——而是构建测试金字塔：提交阶段跑最快的（<5min），合码阶段跑核心的（<15min），夜间跑全量的。 触发场景：CI/CD、持续测试、流水线测试、质量门禁、自动化回归、提交即测试、构建流水线需要加入测试环节时。 Use when the user asks about: integrating tests into a CI/CD pipeline — layered quality gates, fast commit-stage tests, and release blocking criteria.
当需要把测试集成到 CI/CD 流水线中、或者现有流水线的测试环节跑起来效率低不可靠时使用此技能。覆盖流水线各阶段的分层测试卡点设计（提交检查→单元测试→接口测试→UI 测试→回归测试）、工具集成策略和质量门禁配置。不要在 CI 里堆满慢的 UI…
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Read Grep Glob Bash
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 6 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 457 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 384: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.