SKILLEMALL.ai

AC qa-output-validation

在最终输出前对测试用例做最后一轮防幻觉验证:事实核查(引用的需求ID是否存在)、一致性检查(用例之间是否矛盾)、可执行性验证(步骤是否能实际操作)、来源追溯(每个用例是否能追溯到具体需求)。当测试用例已经生成完毕、准备输出了,但你不确定AI有没有编造不存在的功能或需求时,应当使用此技能。这是整个工作流的最终质量守门——如果验证失败,必须返回问题清单要求修正,不得跳过。 触发场景:验证一下输出、检查有没有幻觉、这个用例对吗、确认一下质量、时。 Use when the user asks about: final anti-hallucination verification of generated test cases — fact checking, cross-case consistency, executability, and requirement traceability.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: kokxi v1.8.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 758 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 14 d ago

在最终输出前对测试用例做最后一轮防幻觉验证:事实核查(引用的需求ID是否存在)、一致性检查(用例之间是否矛盾)、可执行性验证(步骤是否能实际操作)、来源追溯(每个用例是否能追溯到具体需求)。当测试用例已经生成完毕、准备输出了,但你不确定AI有没有编造不存在的功能或需求时,应当使用此技能。这是整个工作流的最终质量守门—…

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

Analyzertype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 6 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 758 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 400: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a narrow QA validation skill that reviews generated test cases for hallucinations and does not show hidden execution, persistence, exfiltration, or destructive behavior.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 Sept 2026