SKILLEMALL.ai

BC qa-req-deconstruction

将模糊的需求描述系统化拆分为输入、操作、状态、输出、规则五个可测试维度,同时挖掘显性需求之外的那些"没写出来但必须满足"的隐性需求和衍生需求。当用户的需求描述只有一两句话、或者看起来功能很简单但你可能遗漏了什么的时候,一定要用此技能做深度解构。适用于任何测试任务的第二步骤——无论需求文档有多详细,解构之后总能发现盲区。每条需求带唯一 ID(REQ-{模块缩写}-{序号})。 触发场景:分析这个需求、需求解构、挖掘隐含需求、需求挖掘、需求分析、拆解需求、业务规则提取、需求模糊需要深挖时。 Use when the user asks about: deconstructing a vague requirement into testable dimensions — inputs, operations, states, outputs, and rules — plus mining implied and derived requirements.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: kokxi v1.8.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 879 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 11 d ago

将模糊的需求描述系统化拆分为输入、操作、状态、输出、规则五个可测试维度,同时挖掘显性需求之外的那些"没写出来但必须满足"的隐性需求和衍生需求。当用户的需求描述只有一两句话、或者看起来功能很简单但你可能遗漏了什么的时候,一定要用此技能做深度解构。适用于任何测试任务的第二步骤——无论需求文档有多详细,解构之后总能发现盲区…

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

Proceduretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 15 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 879 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 432: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a requirement-analysis template with disclosed file/URL reading needs and no evidence of hidden execution, exfiltration, persistence, or destructive behavior.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 Sept 2026