SKILLEMALL.ai

AC qa-requirement-review

从完整性、清晰性、一致性、可测试性、可实现性五个维度系统化评审需求文档质量。当用户要求"评审这份需求"、"看看这个PRD写得怎么样"、或者测试用例设计前需要先评估需求质量时,应当使用此技能。如果需求本身有问题(模糊/矛盾/不可测试),后续的测试设计都是徒劳。不要只在用户明确说"需求评审"时才用——任何涉及需求文档的测试任务都应先过一遍需求评审。 触发场景:需求评审、评审需求、需求质量、PRD评审、需求检查、需求写得好不好、评审这份需求、需求提交测试前预审时。 Use when the user asks about: reviewing a PRD or requirement document for completeness, clarity, consistency, testability, and feasibility before test design starts.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: kokxi v1.8.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 542 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 14 d ago

从完整性、清晰性、一致性、可测试性、可实现性五个维度系统化评审需求文档质量。当用户要求"评审这份需求"、"看看这个PRD写得怎么样"、或者测试用例设计前需要先评估需求质量时,应当使用此技能。如果需求本身有问题(模糊/矛盾/不可测试),后续的测试设计都是徒劳。不要只在用户明确说"需求评审"时才用——任何涉及需求文档的测…

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
98/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
94
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 11 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 542 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 397: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 94.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a coherent requirement-review skill with no automatic execution or persistence, though users should treat its unpinned companion install suggestion cautiously.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 Sept 2026