SKILLEMALL.ai

AC qa-risk-intuition

识别那些"看起来很简单但实际风险很高"的测试区域,帮你在有限的测试资源下做优先级判断。当测试时间不够、不知道应该重点测哪些功能、或者直觉告诉你某个功能可能有问题但说不上来为什么时,应当使用此技能。有经验的测试看到某些变更会本能地警觉——这不是玄学,是可以结构化的信号模型:变更/业务/技术/数据/集成五大风险信号雷达,量化打分后按等级分配测试深度与资源。每个风险点带唯一 ID(RISK-{模块}-{风险类型}-{序号})。 触发场景:风险评估、优先级、哪里风险高、风险信号、测试重点、资源分配、高优测试、需要判断测试重点、测试资源有限需要聚焦时。 Use when the user asks about: identifying high-risk areas that look simple — frequently changed modules, third-party dependencies, money and security paths, and historical defect hotspots.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: kokxi v1.8.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 649 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 14 d ago

识别那些"看起来很简单但实际风险很高"的测试区域,帮你在有限的测试资源下做优先级判断。当测试时间不够、不知道应该重点测哪些功能、或者直觉告诉你某个功能可能有问题但说不上来为什么时,应当使用此技能。有经验的测试看到某些变更会本能地警觉——这不是玄学,是可以结构化的信号模型:变更/业务/技术/数据/集成五大风险信号雷达,…

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

Proceduretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 9 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 649 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 463: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 9 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a read-only QA risk-assessment skill with no hidden execution behavior, though users should treat its optional unpinned install command cautiously.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 Sept 2026