BC qa-test-skills
从需求文档自动生成结构化测试用例，覆盖功能测试、边界分析、组合测试和回归测试全流程。自动串联48个专家级子技能，按12步工作流编排执行。适用于：上传需求文档（PRD/Word/PDF/URL）需要完整测试用例时、不知道如何设计测试场景或担心遗漏边界条件时、需要AI评审测试输出并补充测试盲区时。每个步骤都有独立技能支撑，输出格式统一、需求可追溯、覆盖率可量化。 触发场景：生成测试用例、帮我测试、设计测试、上传需求、开始测试、获取安装指引时。 Use when the user asks about: generating structured test cases from a PRD, Word, PDF, or URL through an orchestrated workflow covering functional, boundary, combination, and regression testing.
从需求文档自动生成结构化测试用例，覆盖功能测试、边界分析、组合测试和回归测试全流程。自动串联48个专家级子技能，按12步工作流编排执行。适用于：上传需求文档（PRD/Word/PDF/URL）需要完整测试用例时、不知道如何设计测试场景或担心遗漏边界条件时、需要AI评审测试输出并补充测试盲区时。每个步骤都有独立技能支撑…
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Read Grep Glob WebFetch Bash
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 22 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1576 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 415: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.