AC compliance-check
违规词·与多個免費齊全持續更新的詞庫對比，通過再上架；開箱即用，不用自己加詞。Use when user asks 合规检查, 敏感词, 违规词, 发帖前检查, 内容审核.
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 22. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 7 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 216 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 86: 120–800 characters recommended
- -32 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 6 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 7 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The checker’s core wordlist function is legitimate, but it can send draft text to DeepSeek and expose an unauthenticated local API without clear disclosure in the main skill instructions.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026