SKILLEMALL.ai

AB entity-seo

When the user wants to optimize for entity recognition, Knowledge Graph, or entity-based SEO. Also use when the user mentions "entity SEO," "entity optimization," "Knowledge Graph," "Knowledge Panel," "entity signals," "brand entity," "entity linking," "entity relationships," or "entity-first content." For structured data, use schema-markup.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Kostja Zhang v1.0.1 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 559 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 14 d ago

When the user wants to optimize for entity recognition, Knowledge Graph, or entity-based SEO.

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, failures and branches, progress reporting

ProcedureMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 84): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 85Steps. 36 steps, 2 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1559 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 9 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 343: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a text-only SEO guidance skill and does not request code execution, credentials, private data, or persistent access.
    LLM: benign (high) · 28 May 2026