SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB legal-page-generator

When the user wants to create, optimize, or structure legal pages (Privacy, Terms, etc.). Also use when the user mentions "privacy policy," "terms of service," "legal pages," "cookie policy," "terms and conditions," "legal footer," "legal section," "compliance pages," or "legal requirements." For Privacy Policy content, use privacy-page-generator. For Terms of Service, use terms-page-generator. For Cookie Policy, use cookie-policy-page-generator.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Kostja Zhang v1.1.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 580 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 74/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

GeneratorLegaltype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
74/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 74/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 85Steps. 24 steps, 2 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 580 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 9 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 450: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    The supplied scanner context does not show any artifact-backed unsafe behavior, but the available target artifacts were limited.
    LLM: benign (low) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026