SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD claude-code

调用 Claude Code CLI 进行代码开发、代码审查、bug 修复和自动化任务。当用户需要：(1) 代码审查和审查 PR，(2) 重构和性能优化，(3) 编写测试，(4) 自动修复 lint 错误，(5) 创建 commit 和 PR，(6) 复杂的多文件代码修改，(7) 使用自然语言描述编程任务时使用此技能。此 skill 适用于 OpenClaw 通过 PTY 调用 Claude Code 的场景。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Kotoriy v1.0.0 2 files body ≈ 1 800 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 44/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
44/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (claude-code) differs from the folder (openclaw-claude-code-bailian)
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 26 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1800 tokens
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 207: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 43 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
  • +4Has examples (29 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a legitimate Claude Code usage guide, but it enables broad code changes, PR creation, external tool connections, and third-party API credential use without enough guardrails.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026