BC Cyber Security Roadmap
Generates personalized cybersecurity learning paths based on experience level, goals, and learning preferences.
As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
GeneratorOperations and projectsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:32Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"penetration testing",
quoted -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:57Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"specialization": "penetration testing",
quoted -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:75Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"title": "Penetration Testing Essentials",
quoted -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:98Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"web application pentesting",
quoted -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:102Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"OSCP (Offensive Security Certified Professional)"
quoted
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Cyber Security Roadmap) differs from the folder (toolweb-cybersec-roadmap-v2)
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 25 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2041 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 111: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This skill is a documented external API for generating cybersecurity learning roadmaps, with manageable privacy considerations around the learner details and identifiers it asks users to send.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026