SKILLEMALL.ai

AC xiapi-market-temperature

分析A股市场温度指标,通过估值温度、恐贪指数、趋势温度、动量温度判断市场冷热程度。触发词:市场温度、市场估值、恐贪指数、市场情绪、趋势温度、动量温度。适用场景:判断市场整体冷热、识别买卖信号、情绪分析、估值分析。不适用场景:个股分析、板块分析、债券分析。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 三水清 v1.0.2 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 2 366 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Dangerous commands medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.

For the author

Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • medium Dangerous commands cmd-shell-rc references/token-setup.md:62
      Writes to a shell startup file
      echo 'export DAXIAPI_TOKEN=YOUR_TOKEN_FROM_DAXIAPI' >> ~/.zshrc

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 121 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2366 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -218 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 127: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 35 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 121 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a coherent market-analysis skill, but users should handle API tokens carefully and treat its trading outputs as informational rather than personal financial advice.
    LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026