SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC three-layer-memory

三层记忆系统 + LanceDB Pro 整合版。热/暖/冷记忆自动管理，结合向量数据库实时提取与结构化排程维护。Micro Sync（每天5次扫session记决策+审核autoCapture）、Daily Wrap Up（每天凌晨结构化摘要）、Weekly Compound（每周记忆减脂+蒸馏+向量清理）。含去重检测、scope隔离、archive机制。触发词：记忆系统、memory system、安装记忆、记忆管理、micro sync、daily wrapup、weekly compound、lancedb。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: kylin19860916 v2.0.0 MIT-0 6 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 888 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ReferenceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention SKILL.md:90
    Mentions editing / listing crontab
    crontab -e

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 10 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 888 tokens
  • low The skill ranks results itself: that belongs to the system behind the tool, not the model

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 261: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 14 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 3 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This memory skill is not deceptive, but it sets up recurring jobs that can scan, summarize, retain, and recall conversation history without clear retention, review, or sensitive-data controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026