SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC pick-a-model

Choose a model on Kyma API for a specific job by comparing real per-token price, measured 30-day uptime, and fit for the task. Use when the user asks which model to use, what the cheapest model for something is, whether a model is up or reliable, how two models compare on price, or wants a model configured for Cline, Cursor, Claude Code, Roo Code or another coding agent.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: kyma-api v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 551 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 9 h ago

Choose a model on Kyma API for a specific job by comparing real per-token price, measured 30-day uptime, and fit for the task.

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

IntegrationSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (pick-a-model) differs from the folder (kyma-pick-a-model)
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 16 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 551 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 373: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a simple Kyma model-selection guide with no bundled code, persistence, or hidden access, though its trigger wording is broader than ideal.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 13 Sept 2026