SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF unit-test-coverage-helper

Help users with feat:Add Unit Tests. Use when a user asks for general-help, add, unit, tests, labels, or needs a practical workflow, artifact, checklist, analysis, or implementation support for this requirement.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Kyro v0.1.1 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 383 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Help users with feat:Add Unit Tests.

As a process F 44/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/requirement-plan.md

ProcedureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
44/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/requirement-plan.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/requirement-plan.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/requirement-plan.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/requirement-plan.md
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (unit-test-coverage-helper) differs from the folder (unit-test-coverage-helper-125229)
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 15 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 383 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 211: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a simple unit-test helper skill with overly broad activation wording but no hidden execution, credentials, persistence, or data access.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 14 Jun 2026