SKILLEMALL.ai

AC product-design-iteration

Use this skill when the user wants to iterate on an existing company-internal process management system — adding/modifying/deleting features. Triggers when the user explicitly says "迭代", "给现有产品加功能", "改一下", "删除某功能", or similar iteration requests. Produces delta PRD and modified prototype through a streamlined 4-step process with screenshot-based precision.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: liu v1.0.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 1 191 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (product-design-iteration) differs from the folder (prd-design-iteration)
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 53 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1191 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 357: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 22 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 53 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill appears useful for process/design prototyping, but it should be reviewed because it can collect and persist internal screenshots or HTML while also using public CDN code in generated prototypes.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026