BF blog-auto-poster-skill
多平台文章统一发布与同步工具。支持 CSDN、51CTO、博客园、掘金四个平台。 触发场景：用户需要将文章、博客、Markdown 文件的内容分发或群发到指定平台。 典型指令如：“帮我把这段文字发布到所有平台”、“把这个 MD 文件同步到 CSDN”、“一键群发这篇博客”。
多平台文章统一发布与同步工具。支持 CSDN、51CTO、博客园、掘金四个平台。 触发场景：用户需要将文章、博客、Markdown 文件的内容分发或群发到指定平台。 典型指令如：“帮我把这段文字发布到所有平台”、“把这个 MD 文件同步到 CSDN”、“一键群发这篇博客”。
As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/<平台>.md, templates/default.md, templates/tool-review.md
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Bash
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/<平台>.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/default.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/tool-review.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/deep-dive.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/comparison.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/troubleshooting.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/summary.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/csdn.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/51cto.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/cnblogs.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/juejin.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100
- 0Tools and files. 11 referenced file(s) missing: references/<平台>.md, templates/default.md, templates/tool-review.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Steps. 29 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1146 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 137: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 29 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.