SKILLEMALL.ai

BF order-auto-entry

开箱即用的采购订单自动审核 Skill:读取本地订单或飞书邮箱附件,调用 Laiye ADP 识别跨国采购订单,初始化/写入飞书多维表格订单工作台,上传订单源文件,并给审核负责人发送结构化私信,让业务人员只盯未匹配到内部商品、价格异常、新客户、币种异常等异常。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Laiye ADP v0.1.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 854 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

开箱即用的采购订单自动审核 Skill:读取本地订单或飞书邮箱附件,调用 Laiye ADP 识别跨国采购订单,初始化/写入飞书多维表格订单工作台,上传订单源文件,并给审核负责人发送结构化私信,让业务人员只盯未匹配到内部商品、价格异常、新客户、币种异常等异常。

As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/setup_check.py, scripts/init_lark_workspace.py, scripts/run_demo.py

ProcedureProcurementtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
60
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
33/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/setup_check.py, scripts/init_lark_workspace.py, scripts/run_demo.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/setup_check.py
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/init_lark_workspace.py
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/run_demo.py
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/run_order_audit.py
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/check_order_emails.py
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/workspace.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/troubleshooting.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/setup_check.py, scripts/init_lark_workspace.py, scripts/run_demo.py
  • 0Tools and files. 7 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/setup_check.py, scripts/init_lark_workspace.py, scripts/run_demo.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 52 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1854 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 130: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 10 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 52 items
  • +4Has examples (16 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 60.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill has a clear business purpose, but it needs Review because it grants mailbox and Feishu workspace authority while referencing runtime scripts and config files that are not included in the package.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 26 Jun 2026