AC improvement-executor
当需要把已批准的改进候选应用到目标文件、回滚之前的变更、或预览变更效果时使用。支持 4 种 action（append/replace/insert_before/update_yaml），每次变更前自动备份。不用于打分（用 improvement-discriminator）或门禁验证（用 improvement-gate）。
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "triggers"
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (git, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 37 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1500 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 165: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 37 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is meant to edit files, but its main editor does not implement the documented preview mode and can write to arbitrary file paths, so it needs review before installation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026