AC improvement-gate
当执行完变更需要验证是否应保留、候选被标记 pending 需要人工审批、或想查看待审队列时使用。6 层机械门禁: Schema→Compile→Lint→Regression→Review→HumanReview，其中 Schema/Compile/Regression/Review 为阻塞层（失败即拒绝），Lint 和 HumanReview 为建议层（失败不阻塞但记录警告）。不用于打分（用 improvement-discriminator）或执行变更（用 improvement-executor）。
As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting
AnalyzerSoftware developmentData and analyticsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "triggers"
Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 28 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1355 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 256: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly fits a quality-gate workflow, but it has under-disclosed authority to modify local files during rollback and uses broad triggers that could activate it outside that workflow.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026