SKILLEMALL.ai

AC self-improvement

Captures learnings, errors, and corrections to enable continuous improvement. Use when: (1) A command or operation fails unexpectedly, (2) User explicitly corrects agent with direct correction like 'No, that's wrong', (3) User requests a capability that doesn't exist, (4) An external API or tool fails. CRITICAL: Maximum 1 learning log per user message. Do NOT chain multiple self-improvement actions.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: _silhouette v2.0.0 MIT-0 14 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 1 052 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

IntegrationAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
64/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (self-improvement) differs from the folder (self-improving-agent-hardened)
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 18 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1052 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -43 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • -33 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 402: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This self-improvement skill is not clearly malicious, but it gives agents broad persistent-memory and prompt-file update guidance that users should review carefully before installing.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026